Cadre Country: How China became the Chinese Communist Party

Product Information

In the traditional account, China is a normal sovereign nation, one that happens to be ruled by a communist party, though it has reformed to enable significant capital markets to grow rich. Got some very good insights into how the CCP operates (which is the same as saying how China operates), why it operates that way and what it all means or might mean. Award-winning historian John Fitzgerald focuses on the stories the Communist Party tells about itself, exploring how China works as an authoritarian state, and revealing Beijing’s monumental propaganda productions as a fragile edifice built on questionable assumptions. The definition of the term has broadened significantly since the first decade of the People's Republic of China, spanning from its highest leadership down to relatively low-level positions. Throughout our over one-hundred-year history, our work has directly led to policies that have produced greater freedom, democracy, and opportunity in the United States and the world.

Like a careful detective, Fitzgerald builds his case slowly, allowing the reader to come to these radical conclusions at their own pace. On 1 October 1949, having driven the Kuomintang out of Mainland China, Mao Zedong gave the Proclamation of the People's Republic of China at Tiananmen Square.Award-winning historian John Fitzgerald focuses on the stories the Communist Party tells about itself, exploring how China works as an authoritarian state and revealing Beijing's monumental propaganda productions as a fragile edifice built on questionable assumptions. The Provisional Regulations established the first formal civil service in China since the founding of the People's Republic. Avoiding shibboleths like 'totalitarian' and never assuming the inevitability of the paths China has taken in the past or will take in the future, Fitzgerald gives us a much-needed clinical description of the fundamental nature of Chinese politics.

The book suffers in that you really need to have at least a general knowledge of the last 100 years of Chinese history to be able to make much sense of it, and at the end I still don’t have that much sense of who the actual individual cadres actually are. Following the death of Mao Zedong and the sidelining of Hua Guofeng, China began to embark upon a series of systemic economic reforms under Deng Xiaoping. The CCP in particular sought to avoid any manifestation of "bureaucratism" ( simplified Chinese: 官僚主义; traditional Chinese: 官僚主義; pinyin: guānliáo zhǔyì), a general term referring to potentially undesirable traits that would hinder cadres' ability to effectively work toward achieving socialism.

Deng Xiaoping shared a dissatisfaction with the personnel system at that time, and also pushed for separation of the state and Party at the time.

While the government of China and its legislature have technical authority to manage cadres, in practice, this is the sole purview of the CCP.OverviewSince the founding of the Communist Party in China just over a century ago, there is much the country has achieved. Dong Wang is distinguished professor of history and director of the Wellington Koo Institute for Modern China in World History at Shanghai University (since 2016), a member of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, and an elected Fellow of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. This group has captured the culture and wealth of China, excluding the voices of the common citizens of this powerful and diverse country. It was pretty much like any other suburb in Brisbane, isolated drug use like you would have found in most areas particularly West End.

Summary:"Since the founding of the Communist Party in China just over a century ago, there is much the country has achieved. The cadre system, as the party's main instrument, also continues to impinge equally on all these branches of the party's domain of governance. Leading cadre status is not dependent on rank, as many high-ranking cadres may nevertheless not be in what is considered a leading position.This group has captured the culture and wealth of China, excluding the voices of the common citizens of this powerful and diverse country. While nationwide data does not exist on the breakdown of cadre versus non-cadre membership, it appears that a large number of Party members were considered cadres at that time.