About this deal
Abtan, et al. v. Prince, et al. and Albazzaz, et al. v. Prince, et al". Center for Constitutional Rights. Archived from the original on February 7, 2017 . Retrieved February 2, 2017. Following Reinhardt’s lead, I take a “Cicero first approach” (p. xxvi) in this review by focusing on an interpretive question that continues to divide scholars: what sort of sceptic was Cicero? This question is taken up most directly in Section 8 of the introductory essay, but the answer given there draws on claims about pre-Ciceronian material advanced in earlier sections (especially 4 and 6) and throughout the ensuing commentary. It therefore provides a concrete example of the way the volume’s interpretive claims hang together.
a b "About Total Intelligence Solutions". Archived from the original on October 18, 2007 . Retrieved October 24, 2007. animi autem quae essent ad comprehendendam ingeniis virtutem idonea, eaque ab his in naturam et mores dividebantur. naturae celeritatem ad discendum et memoriam dabant, quorum utrumque mentis esset proprium et ingenii; morum autem putabant studia esse et quasi consuetudinem, quam partim assiduitate exercitationis partim ratione formabant, in quibus erat ipsa philosophia; in qua quod inchoatum est neque
Scriitorii academici din toate domeniile se confruntă cu provocări similare în timpul procesului de scriere. Puteți să vă îmbunătățiți propria scriere academică, evitând aceste greșeli comune. Sizemore, Bill. "Xe Services names its first compliance chief". Hampton Roads. Archived from the original on June 15, 2011 . Retrieved June 16, 2011. as ‘Illam’ Ακαδημικὴν σύνταξιν᾽ (Att. xiii. 6. 1), but the two volumes were actually named Catulus and Lucullus, after the leading interlocutors in each. Hortensius also figured in Catulus, and Cicero in both. HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION" (PDF). October 2, 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 18, 2011 . Retrieved April 16, 2011.a b c d e f g "Academi – About Us – Board of Directors". Archived from the original on October 24, 2017 . Retrieved April 12, 2016. burson-marsteller.com/Integrated_fecal". July 28, 2012. Archived from the original on July 28, 2012. It is to this second edition that Cicero refers in his letters in all allusions to the work after the alteration was made; its title was now Academica, though he also describes it as ‘Academici libri.’ But he seems not to have succeeded in entirely suppressing the first edition; and by a curious accident the second half of the first edition has come down to us, while of the second edition only the first quarter and a few fragments of the remainder have survived. We therefore have only three quarters of the whole work, and only one quarter of it in the form finally authorized by the writer. Some modern editors have designated the extant part of Edition I. ‘Academica Priora’ and that of Edition II. ‘Academica Posteriora,’ but so far as I know the significance intended to be conveyed by the adjectives in those titles has no classical authority.
Eder, Walter; Strothmann, Meret (2006). "Tullia". In Hubert Cancik; Helmuth Schneider; Christine F. Salazar; Manfred Landfester; Francis G. Gentry (eds.). Brill's New Pauly, Antiquity Volumes. doi: 10.1163/1574-9347_bnp_e1222290. ISBN 9789004122598. Archived from the original on July 8, 2019 . Retrieved February 12, 2018. (subscription required)quid mare nonne caeruleum? at eius unda cum est pulsa remis, purpurascit, et quidem aquae tinctum quodam modo et infectum